Research
Job Market Paper
State versus Cultural Nationalism and the Legitimacy–Unity Trade-off: Evidence from China
When does nationalism strengthen authoritarian rule, and at what cost? Autocrats often promote state nationalism, which defines the nation through political institutions and territorial boundaries rather than simply through shared culture. I argue that it creates a legitimacy–unity trade-off: it increases perceived regime legitimacy and support for ethnic minority accommodation, but weakens national identification among regime opponents, for whom dissatisfaction with the regime spills over into disidentification from the nation. I test this argument through two online experiments alongside a large-scale laboratory experiment in mainland China and Hong Kong, using a novel compare-and-argue self-persuasion design that generates exogenous variation in conceptions of the nation. In mainland China, state nationalism raises regime legitimacy and, under external threat, support for minority accommodation. In Hong Kong, state nationalism amplified how repression-related news and government dissatisfaction weakened national identification. The findings suggest that nationalism in autocracies can secure loyalty to the regime at the expense of attachment to the nation.
Working Papers
Drafts available upon request.
- The Feedback Effects of Failed Nation-Building: Experimental Evidence from China Under Review
- Victimhood Complements Victory Under Review
- Self-Persuasion as Experimental Belief Manipulation: A Compare-and-Argue Method
- What Does It Mean to Be Chinese? Inclusive Nationalism in a Resilient Authoritarian Regime